Sentry Dog
Handler, Đà Nàng AB & Phu Cat AB Air Bases, RVN (1968-1970)
Instructor
Military Working Dog Studies Branch (Sentry. Patrol, & Narcotic
Detector Courses), Security Police Academy, Lackland AFB, TX (1971-1975)
Kennelmaster,
Security Police Squadron, Kessler AFB, MS (1976)
NCOIC
Narcotic Detector Dog Section, 3rd Law Enforcement Squadron,
Clark AB, Republic of the Philippines, 1976-1977
NCOIC,
Military Working Dog Training Section, Security Police Kennels, 3rd
Security Police Group, Clark AB, Republic of the Philippines, 1977-1978
NCOIC PACAF
Military Working Dog Training Center, Kadena Air Base, Japan 1978-1981
There has
been some discussion as to when the last sentry dogs were trained. It was my
privilege to be one of a handful of AF dog school instructors to teach
sentry dog classes after the military conversion to patrol dogs.
Sentry dogs
guarded nuclear weapon storage areas and/or uploaded bomber aircraft at SAC
bases. Bases such as Ellsworth AFB, SD; Minot AFB, ND; Loring AFB, ME;
Plattsburgh AFB, NY, etc. were noted for their northern latitudes and cold
climates. With the end of the Cold War, many of the bases are only memories.
Patrol dogs were assigned to bases that had never needed sentry dog sections
due to different missions and assets. For example, Kessler AFB, MS (home to
the electronic technical and air traffic controller schools) had two patrol
dogs and two narcotic detector dogs. In early 1976, it received a Miniature
Schnauzer explosive detector dog from Lackland's ill-fated small dog
program. Fritz was an aggressive big dog trapped in a small dog's body. He
would bite an ankle on command and release on command. It was great for
demos. The small dogs were returned to Lackland for disposition at the end
of their program. I often wonder if they met the same fate of far too many
Vietnam sentry dogs.
When I
arrived at the dog school in late 1971, I was promptly assigned to the
sentry dog course. I was only Sentry Qualified from an OJT course taught at
Đà Nàng AB, RVN, by the kennelmaster, SSgt Carl Wolfe. I had only seen one
patrol dog in Vietnam. The classes were small and usually had only one
instructor. My first class was with an Army E-6 instructor named Jim Webb.
Lackland utilized an apprentice type training system for first time
instructors assigned to the school. Other Army instructors were E-6's Clyde
Morgan, and Henry Yates. A few of the other AF instructors were Jim
McIlwain, Jon Kidwell, and Donald Parkinson. After a few classes and my
first instructor evaluation, I was given a class to teach alone. I fell
into my element.
It was the
latter years of US military involvement in Vietnam. I loved the classes and
the Army students. Army students removed from technical schools were
automatically reclassified as infantry and given rush orders to Vietnam. No
MP dog school students were in a rush to do that. So we had absolutely no
discipline problems. For a young AF NCO, I could teach without having to
deal with problem children. The Army policy of promoting the honor graduate
of every class was also a big incentive for students to work hard.
Conversely, younger patrol dog instructors worked with other team members
and were supervised by a Patrol Dog Team Leader. They had a much larger
safety net.
In the early
70's, the Army returned many sentry dogs to Lackland for retraining as the
missile batteries were closed. The Army had located Nike sites containing
ground to air anti-aircraft missiles that ringed major US cities and some
critical military installations. Sites were located on the outskirts in
rural areas and were protected at night by sentry dog teams. For instance,
Washington DC had two well known sites located in Waldorf, MD and east of
Upper Marlboro, MD, near the Patuxent River. When the Waldorf site closed,
its base housing came under the authority of Andrews AFB, MD. The upper
Marlboro site became a HUD housing project.
Young sentry
dogs were retrained as patrol dogs and shipped out. Older dogs nearing their
useful life were used as training aids. At that time all classes spent the
first few weeks in the temporary kennel area before moving into the
permanent kennel area. Dogs were chained to the fence using a heavy leather
collar. The dog had a shipping crate for shelter. A strip of target cloth
nailed to a wood frame provided shade. It was safer for an inexperienced
student handler to enter and leave the dog's kennel because there was no
gate to open and close. After the dog team relationship had developed, the
classes were moved to the permanent kennels. It was then safe to use the
standard dog kennel with an attached house.
Sentry dog
students were rarely bitten by another handler’s dog. The most dangerous
time occurred during an off-leash attack. The critical time was when the dog
first sensed the presence of a human approaching from its rear. It was a
simple case of "my bad guy, don't interrupt my bite." The dog would show his
displeasure by biting the hand that was picking up his leash and interfering
with pleasure of biting. Usually the dog would release his bite after he
realized that it was his handler, but not always... by that time the handler
probably had several punctures on his arm, hand or other body parts.
Patrol dog
students received a higher percentage of dog bites than sentry dog students
due to discontinued use of the sentry dog suit. Patrol dog students usually
were bitten while decoying during attack training. At that, time all attack
gear was homemade. The Federal stock numbers were for large padded attack
sleeves and sentry dog suits. Patrol dog attack gear consisted of ace
bandages and fire hose scrounged from the vet and the fire department, and
canvas target cloth. The parachute shop on base was a great place to have
attack gear (called wraps) sewn. The patrol dog was required to bite and
hold, but not bite any specific part of the body. The decoy’s job was to
present the protected arm and not allow the dog to bite any other part of
his unprotected body. During this time, the hospital gained a lot of
experience in treating dog bites.
Patrol dog
students were in awe of the stories of the aggressive nature of sentry dogs.
Some of the dogs were truly famous.
At the time
of my arrival, a sentry dog class graduated every Friday and a new class
started every Monday. By mid-73, the class schedule changed to reflect the
Vietnam draw down and the Nike site closures. Instead of starting every
Monday, there might be a gap of several weeks before a sentry dog class
started. This gave me a chance to work with several patrol dog teams and
learn from such accomplished dog trainers as TSgts Robert Leek, David
Robinson, Carl Wolf (my kennelmaster from Đà Nàng AB), and my last team leader,
Donald Bizic. Then after a class or two, I would return for a sentry dog
class. I was given a patrol dog diploma after teaching several patrol dog
classes-- military logic!
This jumping
between courses continued for a year or so. I started teaching my sentry dog
classes some of the things that I learned in patrol dog classes. My sentry
dogs knew how to search buildings. There were some buildings on sentry dog
posts, so it made sense! I used patrol dog attack gear so that the dogs
were not looking for someone wearing a big suit. Whenever possible, I
planned long scouting problems down the middle of the creek than ran through
the sentry dog area. The dual purpose was to teach handlers to move silently
through water and in the Texas heat, handlers & dogs loved it to cool off.
Towards the
end of my time in the sentry dog course, I received a special opportunity to
learn from a true master of dog training. CMSgt Robert Riley, the sentry dog
course chief and later head of the PACAF dog school arranged for me to work
with a retiring patrol dog team chief. TSgt Ed Marcinko was widely regarded
as one of the best trainers at Lackland in the early 70’s.. Patrol dog teams
were almost secretive about their techniques used to train problem dogs. So
Ed Marcinko's last class was a sentry dog class. CMSgt Riley told me to
learn as much as I could. Ed spent over 12 years at Lackland and forgot more
about dogs than most handlers knew. Ed Marcinko had the nickname Rocky. The
name was earned by youthful behavior of some fame among older dog handlers.
He never told me how that nickname came about.
Ed taught me
that dogs never exhibited a behavior without a reason. I learned that food
reward did have usefulness. Food reward could be used to teach a dog to
ignore gunfire. The normal thinking was that gun-shy dogs were
untrainable. At his request, the kennel support staff would reduce a
gun-shy dog’s rations by half. During gunfire training, the handler would
get the hungry dog’s attention with a morsel of food. At a signal, someone
would fire one blank round in the distance. At that moment the dog was
wrapping it’s hungry lips around food and had the choice to eat or be scared
of gunfire. We moved the gunfire closer each day. It worked! Another method
for gun green dogs was using two thirty foot leashes to keep a dog swimming
in the center of a pond. The dog could swim or worry about the gunfire and
go underwater. The key was to take the dog's mind off the gunfire and
gradually reduce the distance from the gunfire.
As strong a
motivator as food reward was, Ed looked at it as a poor substitute for a
strong relationship between the handler and dog. He thought that the quick
use of food was only good for clown dogs. He used that phrase to describe
circus dogs that licked their lips after each trick. I wonder what he would
say at the current trend to use a play toy for reward for basic obedience.
I was surprised to see that. Has a decoy ever thrown balls at the dog during
an off-leash bite? I have seen dogs pick up an attack sleeve and carry it
around instead of biting a decoy. Will a toy trained dog do the same? Seems
highly likely…
Ed taught
convection in building search and scouting. This is the heating of scent
particles that rise and travel a distance before sinking as they cool. He
also felt that chase was the best confidence builder for a under aggressive
dog to enhance its prey-kill instinct. After days of chases, one day the
decoy would stop and place the wrap in the dog's mouth. The handler would
immediately apply lavish praise for the dog's actions. He would instill in
decoys the need to never cause a dog pain during attack training.
I
learned more from Ed Marcinko in eight weeks than in the rest of my time at
Lackland. He taught me that understanding animal behavior was important. My
next few sentry dog classes were a complete blast. Working alone gave me the
chance to teach what I thought my handlers should know. My sentry dogs were
used to biting small concealed wraps. The big heavy sentry dog suit was
brought out so that young dogs would not be surprised by its bulkiness for
class evaluations. My dogs always came out on command. It was safer for the
handler, but like a bullet, they could not be called back. The last class
that I taught was in 1973 or early 74. A Marine in the class went to the
Mediterranean area and the Army students went to Korea. The retrained Army
sentry dog Sunny mentioned later in this article was in that class.
Do you know
that dogs exhibit some of the same behavior patterns as wild dogs of Africa,
Australia, and American wolves? When a canine is approached by an alpha male
or female, it will lower its ears, tail, and cower for a split second. This
shows submission. A dog will exhibit the same behavior to its handler.
Watch your own dog!
I first saw
the behavior on a National Geographic Special on wild dogs of Africa. The
next day, I noticed a class of sentry dogs exhibit the same behavior at the
approach of their handlers. After that, I used that to judge when it was
safe for a handler to enter a cage. Every now and then, a dog would not show
the behavior until the handler was actually inside the kennel. That required
a leap of faith from the handler.
Only once in
all my sentry dog classes, I had untrained or green dogs. That class was
scheduled to ship to Korea with their dogs. All my other classes had a few
dogs that were failures from patrol dog classes. Some dogs would be under
aggressive, refusing to bite. A few would be old sentry dogs, too old to
ship, but still healthy enough to be training aids. And there were always
the dogs considered too aggressive to be patrol dogs.
Normal theory
was to introduce attack work almost immediately after a few days of
agitation. On known weak or “no biters”, I used several weeks of chases.
The killer dog was able to woof at the bad guy and the decoy ran away in
mortal fear. Then the handler gave the dog lavish praise. Days later, the
decoy would suddenly stop and place the protected arm in the dog’s mouth. It
was common for the dog to release the bite and look at the handler for
approval, sometimes with a confused look on their face that seemed to say,”
I can bite a human!” Usually, when shown that the behavior was okay, each
bite would subsequently be stronger, harder, and longer.
Some dogs
would be overaggressive, fail to release on command, and/or attempt to bite
their own handler. In those cases, harsh or creative corrections techniques
were used. The key was timing. A water balloon upside the head when the dog
heard its handler yelling “No!”, was a very effective surprise correction.
Another good thrown aid was an aluminum soda can filled with noisy nuts and
bolts and taped shut. An accurate hit on the side did not hurt, but made a
lot of noise. The key was the proper timing of both the physical and verbal
corrections. Initially a kennel chain was connected to a tree. The handler
could step outside the marked circle if the dog was prone to attack for
“interfering” with a bite. It seemed strange telling the decoy to step
inside the circle to get bit and for the handler to step outside before
commanding the dog to release. But it worked. Gradually, the same method
would be worked with a 360 inch leash.
The official
AF answer was to kill any dog that was entered into training and failed to
qualify after a suitable number of classes. Nothing was as bad as knowing
that you were dog’s last chance. The sentry dog classes were the last
refuge for some dogs. Make it or else; do or die!
Towards the
end of the sentry dog era, only a few Army instructors were left. Classes
were taught as needed. Army instructor E-6 Clyde Morgan went from teaching
sentry classes to becoming a patrol dog team chief. He joined E-6’s Terry
Bennet and Roberts. I did get in trouble at Lackland. I had started calling
patrol dogs “Puppy Dogs”. There was no disrespect, only stating the facts
that the PD classes had young untrained dogs, and sentry dogs were often
old, gray-muzzled dogs. Many times I felt that a decoy might be able to
outrun a dog. However, heaven help him if he fell. A pass-on was read from
the back office that the term “Puppy Dogs” would not be used to describe
patrol dogs. After that I really made it a point to call them Puppy Dogs
and refer to sentry dogs
as "big dogs".
The majority
of the patrol dog teams in the early 70s felt that the best patrol dogs were
ex-sentry dogs. Most ex-sentry dogs when "broken" down into patrol
dogs usually maintained a better bite. Young untrained dogs were first
taught that they could bite humans, and then within a week started receiving
corrections when introduced to controlled aggression to come out on
command. After this training segment, the amount of pressure exerted during
a bite would actually decrease on many dogs. During the PACAF Security
Police Conference (1977 or 1976), there was some discussion about the
continued need for sentry dogs in the PACAF area. CMSgt Robert Riley,
Superintendent, PACAF Military Working Dog Training Center, Kadena AB,
Japan, mentioned this to me. His comment was that at first he had been a
supporter of that, but after some thought he realized that patrol dogs had
been responsible for the growth of the USAF dog program.
Patrol dogs
in PACAF (even after Vietnam) were closer to sentry dogs than stateside
patrol dogs. Even drug detector dogs at Clark AB, RP were "overaggressive"
by AF standards. My first day as NCOIC of Clarks drug detector dog section,
I was bitten by one of the drug dogs. SSgt John Probst (now Colonel Probst,
the last former Clark handler on active duty!) was the day flight chief. He
was showing me the security procedures for the departure of a Flying Tigers
DC-8 passenger aircraft. As I entered the front passenger seat of the
section’s crew cab Dodge Power Wagon, a dog in the back seat reached over
and bit my arm when I rested it on the seat back. Such was my introduction
to "tolerant” PACAF drug detector dogs. It was not a bite and hold
situation, just a snap to remind me that the truck was "his truck" and I was
an intruder. Coming in from Stateside, I wanted all the dogs to meet the
controlled aggression requirements and conducted the training myself.
Within a few
months, the patrol dogs of Clark were in the midst of a diplomatic
incident. Theft of property had always been a major problem on Clark. Even
trash was valuable. The kennels had a carpenter paid with empty dog food
buckets. The Security Police Group had a whole village that was paid by
having access to the base dump. They cut the grass among the perimeter with
machetes by hand. Anyway, an intruder was severely bitten by a patrol dog
named Sun. President Carter had been exerting pressure on Ferdinand Marcos,
the dictator of the Philippines Islands over his poor human rights record.
The bite gave the Filipino government a chance to throw stones at the US.
The theft problem on Clark was almost uncontrollable. For example, when the
Manila airport was being expanded, three patrol dogs teams were used at
night to protect the runway and taxiway lights from theft. A base fire truck
was stolen, driven to Manila, and sold to the airport. The Manila airport
happily bought items that could only have come from Clark. Underground
electrical and communication cables even had to be guarded.
The embassy
started asking questions about the dogs and demanded to see Sun. Manila
newspapers ran stories about the nasty dogs tearing up poor Filipinos for
stealing garbage from the wealthy base. The kennelmaster replied with a CYA
letter that stated that he had just become aware that some dogs might be
overaggressive. He also quoted the AF regulation calling for euthanasia of
overaggressive dogs. My drug dogs were okay, so I volunteered to help the
training section with problem patrol dogs. I soon found myself dealing with
some real dogs. Harsh corrections failed on some of the dogs. I had thought
for some time about electric shock for corrections. The timing for a
correction is critical. The kennelmaster gave me his blessings if the vet
approved. I knew the vet from Lackland. He was not anxious to kill dogs for
doing what they had been trained to do, so he gave me his okay. The one
catch was I had to use it on myself first.
The
electronic shop on base that repaired all test equipment (PMEL), made me a
simple transformer that could be upped from 6 volts DC to about 50,000
volts. They insisted that it did not have enough amperage to kill. With me
holding the leads and someone hitting the switch, it resulted in what could
be described as a religious experience. The parachute shop made me a 30 foot
nylon leash with a flexible coax cable running down the center. They also
mounted two brass electrodes on a leather collar. I demonstrated it on
myself to the base veterinarian and the kennelmaster and received their
blessings. Resources Protection, “C” Flight handler, SrA Paul Newman,
chalked a cartoon of a dog seated in a electric chair being shocked by yours
truly in the kennels break room and gave me the nickname "Dr Frankendog."
I started
working on the patrol dogs. The purpose was to apply an "electrical"
correction at the same moment as the dog heard a verbal correction “No!”
from the handler. It was like God reached out and touched the dog. Where
moments before the dog was ignoring its handler, now the dog would spit out
the decoy out. A few runs and I would have to repair electrical
connections. Within a few weeks, I had worked with most of the really
hardheaded dogs. Until then, some dogs never would do a standoff. Physical
corrections were ignored, the dog would just close its eyes and bite
harder. Diplomatic pressure had seemed to be relaxing on the base, so I
told the kennelmaster that the dogs were okay. He seemed more than happy to
"play along". No dogs were killed to meet AF regulations. The collar worked,
but was not rugged enough to handle the impact. The electrical connections
were the weak link.
Sadly, the
helpful Superintendent of the PMEL lab was killed several months after he’d
helped me. He was stabbed during a nighttime robbery attempt in his home. We
also lost a dog handler at Clark to armed Filipinos. Bob
Gray was
stabbed to death. His dog Casey was shot with Bob’s revolver that one of
perpetrators had taken after Bob was stabbed and incapacitated. It was never
a question of harmless thieves. Filipino thieves used knives because under
martial law, guns resulted in instant jailing with long sentences. Thus,
Casey was shot rather than Bob.
Years later
SSgt
Louis
(Robby)
Robillard, “C” Flight Chief
told me of
his experience while attending the Supervisors course at Lackland. He
witnessed a "new" training technique with a remote shock collar at
Lackland. He didn't tell them of my collar used years before at Clark.
The very last
sentry dogs handled by USAF Security Police handlers were at Osan AB, Korea
in May-June 1980. SSgt Cathy Moore, Instructor, PACAF MWDTC, (also my wife)
and I were TDY to Osan teaching a drug detector class. TDY funds were tight
for the units and it was cheaper to pay our TDY to Korea than the TDY costs
for a whole class to Kadena AB, Japan. We had one student from Taegu AB, and
several from Kunsan, Kwan-Ju, and Osan Air Bases.
Several days
into the course, I was asked to return early to the kennels by the
Kennelmaster Robert Smith. In the kennel area two Army trucks stacked full
of dog shipping crates. An Army Hawk site was being closed down. The dogs
were declared excess and were being shipped to an Army veterinarian for
euthanasia. With no further need for them, neither the Army nor the Korean
forces wanted the dogs. The Army would not ship the dogs back to Lackland.
The handlers on the truck would give the dogs to anyone willing to sign a
hand receipt. They did not want to see their dogs killed. The kennelmaster
could not sign the hand receipt for dogs that the Army no longer used.
However, as
NCOIC of the PACAF MWDTC, I could change the Federal Stock Numbers on the
dogs from Sentry to Patrol dogs. I had recognized one dog on sight-- Sunny
had been in my last sentry dog class and had shipped to Korea with his
handler. One dog was 2 years old and had been in country less than three
months. I did not have time to ask permission from DOD or anyone else. The
Army handlers needed to leave for Seoul to get there before curfew. I
reviewed the health records and decided to retrain most of the dogs. Our
drug dog students volunteered to work their drug dogs in the morning and
work the sentry dogs in the afternoon. I assigned dogs to handlers based on
their assigned bases’ dog shortages. One SrA in the class held the
distinction to be the first AF female handler to be assigned a sentry dog.
Sunny still came out on command. We did attack work and I soon had all of
the dogs releasing on command.
Standoff was
iffy on some of the dogs, but the kennelmasters could work on that. Many
other "patrol dogs" in PACAF had shared that trait. The dogs were used to
fill slots in Korea that had been open for years. Every AF base in Korea
(except Taegu) received a few patrol dogs. The Chief of Security Police for
PACAF was on a tour of Korea. I had a chance to brief him on the dogs and
obtained his blessings. He was happy to hear that I had filled long open
requests (called MILSTRIPS in AF speak). Since, the school "worked" for HQ
PACAF, we were okay. Later, when the school was converted to a ATC field
training detachment, I was told that we would no longer do "things" like
that
The end
of sentry dogs was the birth of patrol, drug detector, and explosive
detector dogs. But they will always be "big dogs" to me..